engine build question
jeepboy45
Old Time Jeeper
- Posts
- 1,239
- Thanks
- 2
- Location
- Altamonte Springs, Florida
- Vehicle(s)
- 1979 CJ-7, Newly rebuilt AMC 360!, fully rebuilt GM TH400, Quadra-trac TC w/Milemarker 2x4 conversion, AMC mod 20 rear w/1 piece Moser axleshafts, mod 30 front w/tie rod flip and castor correction shims, 4 in lift, Centech complete wiring harness, dual electric fans on 3 core aluminum radiator, tilt steering wheel, 20 gal poly gas tank, new J20 steering box, MSD 6A ignition combined with TeamRush distributor mods
Hey Guys,,,
Then 360 I am building was already torn down when I bought it in pieces. Just picked it up from machine shop and for the life of me cant find documentation of which way the connecting rods go in. Both the cap and rod are stamped with the cylinder number, but I dont know if the numbers face inboard or outboard on the crank journal. Plus, the very top of the connecting rod is not perfectly symetrical so I know it does matter which way they go.
As shown here, there is a small "dimple" on the top of each piston....I am assuming it goes towards the front of the engine, but I dont want to just assume..
thanks for any help...
brian
There is a small dimple on top of each piston. I am "assuming" that this points forward, but I dont really want to just "assume"...
Any help.
brian
Then 360 I am building was already torn down when I bought it in pieces. Just picked it up from machine shop and for the life of me cant find documentation of which way the connecting rods go in. Both the cap and rod are stamped with the cylinder number, but I dont know if the numbers face inboard or outboard on the crank journal. Plus, the very top of the connecting rod is not perfectly symetrical so I know it does matter which way they go.
As shown here, there is a small "dimple" on the top of each piston....I am assuming it goes towards the front of the engine, but I dont want to just assume..
thanks for any help...
brian
There is a small dimple on top of each piston. I am "assuming" that this points forward, but I dont really want to just "assume"...
Any help.
brian