• Hello Guest, we are proud to now have our Wiki online that is completely compiled and written by our members. Feel free to browse our Jeep-CJ Wiki or click on any orange keyword when looking at posts in the forum.

My Neighbor and Welfare ?

Status
Not open for further replies.
My Neighbor and Welfare ?
Only thing I am going to add is some people need help. But I don't care what your situation is you should not get it for free. You should be doing some sort of work, collection trash, mowing weeds, sweeping a sidewalk, training, school or whatever, to get money from a taxpayer funded organization. There should be something productive resulting from every taxpayer dollar even if you are bed-ridden (no exceptions). Even in bed with today's technology, work can be preformed on your back (left someone a opening for a great follow-up, LOL). I work too hard for my dollars to give to the government let alone someone else who is not working. BUT I do believe in helping someone on hard-times, they just have to work for it.

rocmoc n AZ/Mexico
 
The younger generation for the most part has become the entitlement generation. If they cant work and save for it it should be given to them. Nowadays everyone needs things instantly.

Im working as much O.T. as I can right now to pull off X-mas and purchase a Cj. Im also cutting back and stashing some funds to build an off roader. Working for and saving money is fast becoming a lost art.
 
The younger generation for the most part has become the entitlement generation. If they cant work and save for it it should be given to them. Nowadays everyone needs things instantly.

Im working as much O.T. as I can right now to pull off X-mas and purchase a Cj. Im also cutting back and stashing some funds to build an off roader. Working for and saving money is fast becoming a lost art.


10-4 on that. its harder to find someone that is applying that and learn from them.
 
I was watching the Ken Burns documentary on the Dust Bowl a couple of nights ago. A lady was talking about the WPA, and some who complained that it was just "make work". Her view - the farmers were flat broke, but too proud to take government handouts. But they would work, even if the work didn't really produce anything, for some kind of wage. That kind of pride seems to be lacking now.
 
I find it amazing and disconcerting that the neighbor has 4 kids a wife and a mother in law all living in a house provided for him free of charge - free electric and propane - (by the rich dude that owns the property in exchange for watching the property - read paid under the table) He draws welfare because he and his wife show no income - his kids get foodstamps - they all get medicare - and they all live really well. They drive to town, eat out, always have at least 5 vehicles full of gas - and no one questions what is wrong with the picture?

The guy that owns the place is a millionaire in Billings, MT that owns a hotel and a couple city blocks - he rants and raves about taxes and Romney/Obama - and yet he facilitates the welfare state of mind?

So, I will climb on down from my soapbox - and shut up - but it seems like it ain't right...:censored:

:)Corn,
I here you loud and clear............

Hopefully I will also not offend anyone by expressing my opinions.

Welfare , a subject we all have nothing good to say about except that there are some real needy out there that truely deserve it and for the most we all want to help the poor!

The system is comprised of 83 overlapping means tested programs totaling for the first time in 2011 $1.028 Trillion Dollars (excluding Social Security & Medicare or Vet programs)........for the most part the Gov. & the media invariably discuss welfare one program at a time and by doing so conceal the overall size of the welfare state. Welfare exceeds Defense spending by almost a 2 to 1 ratio and has done so for nearly two decades.
The cost of welfare has risen expeditiously over the past two decades , with the largest rise being in the last 4 years by more than a third....but lets not lose sight of the real problem and it is not 100% the recipients fault. The real problem lies in the enabling party IE; the Federal Government. It has been well stated by several leading private economist that the levy or as they call it "Administrative Costs" the Government charges to Administrate these programs is way to expensive. The numbers that float around are upwards of .50 cents on the dollar with some convinced that it's really much higher. So in essence 50% of the money gets to someone who deserves it.
Lets put that into perspective........you manage someone else's money , you provide the labor to do so and will call it a real for profit business and your rate of return starts at 50% less your overhead...........how would you like to get into that venture? That's a hell of a profit center!
Lets also not forget that the Government is the largest Union employer in the country and has lead hiring for the past decade with a 15% increase in employee's while the private sector has been stuck in the low single digits.
The Senate Budget Committee is out with a new report last month, and it states "Food stamps has quarupled in the last decade. But rather than trying to curb spending here the government advertises to get more people on the books" it goes on to state "Existing federal policy has explicitly encouraged growth in welfare enrollment while combined with a weakening of welfare standards and rules"

Want to fix Welfare? Look to Washington.

Happy Thanksgiving to all!
:D:D:D:D
 
Ya wanna hear about that voting thing,, check this out and do your own math and figuring.....:mad: Remember all those lawsuits by Democrats demanding that any voter identification laws be repealed? Well, now we know why they filed them. They needed to steal the vote in certain key states so that Obama could be reelected.

Curiously, Obama lost in every state that requires a photo ID to be produced before voting. A list of closely contested state elections with no voter ID, which narrowly went to Obama include: Minnesota (10), Iowa (6), Wisconsin (10), Nevada (6), Colorado (9), New Mexico (5) and Pennsylvania (20).

This amounts to a total of 66 electoral votes. When added to Romney’s total of 205 electoral votes, that would give Romney 271 electoral votes, enough votes to win even without Ohio or Florida Romney also likely had the states of Florida and Ohio stolen from him, which don’t require photo IDs.

Ohio requires a non-photo ID. Would a library card do? Florida “requests” a photo ID, but doesn’t require it. So what happens if they request a photo ID and the illegal alien Haitian doesn’t have one? Do they just count the vote anyway?



In the Philadelphia polling places where GOP polling inspectors were forcibly removed (and illegally) removed from polling locations, Obama got over 99%
of the vote. Ward 4, which also had a poll watcher dressed in Obama attire, went massively for Obama. Mr. Obama received 99.5% of the vote, defeating Mr. Romney 9,955 to 55
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Jeep-CJ Donation Drive

Help support Jeep-CJ.com by making a contribution.

Help support Jeep-CJ.com by making a contribution.
Goal
$200.00
Earned
$0.00
This donation drive ends in
0 hours, 0 minutes, 0 seconds
  0.0%
Back
Top Bottom