360 crank in 401 block
lgbent
Jeeper
Hi, I was thinking about putting a 360 crank in a 401 block. Would it be worth the trouble & what would be involved to do it?
Thanks Grant
Thanks Grant
-
Hello Guest, we are proud to now have our Wiki online that is completely compiled and written by our members. Feel free to browse our Jeep-CJ Wiki or click on any orange keyword when looking at posts in the forum.
360 crank in 401 block
- Thread starter lgbent
- Start date Start date:
- Last post Last post:
CJ
Admin
- Posts
- 26,174
- Featured
- 3
- Media
- 881
- Resources
- 193
- Solutions
- 59
- Thanks
- 1,075
- Location
- Central FL
- Vehicle(s)
- '72 CJ5, 401, T18, D20, D44, D30
'82 CJ8, 258, D300, AMC20, D30
It would be very little trouble - but why? You would need to either change pistons or have some custom made..
Do you want to destroke the 401 for RPM purposes?
An AMC 401 can wind out like hell...
Do you want to destroke the 401 for RPM purposes?
An AMC 401 can wind out like hell... 
LongHorn
Always Off-Roading Jeeper
- Posts
- 5,315
- Media
- 49
- Thanks
- 1
- Location
- Washington Co.,Texas
- Vehicle(s)
- 83'CJ-8 Scrambler Slightly Modified;),48'CJ2A, 54'CJ3B 67'Jeep M-725, 88'YJeep Wrangler Slightly Modified;)
It's doable, but why?
LongHorn
Always Off-Roading Jeeper
- Posts
- 5,315
- Media
- 49
- Thanks
- 1
- Location
- Washington Co.,Texas
- Vehicle(s)
- 83'CJ-8 Scrambler Slightly Modified;),48'CJ2A, 54'CJ3B 67'Jeep M-725, 88'YJeep Wrangler Slightly Modified;)
It would be very little trouble - but why? You would need to either change pistons or have some custom made..
Do you want to destroke the 401 for RPM purposes?
I agree w/CJ, that it would be of little trouble.
As far as de-stroking for RPM potential, I don't see that replacing a forged reciprocating assembly with a cast reciprocating assembly, even of shorter stroke would extend you RPM's by much. I'd be more worried about oiling issues, & valve train problems.
CJ
Admin
- Posts
- 26,174
- Featured
- 3
- Media
- 881
- Resources
- 193
- Solutions
- 59
- Thanks
- 1,075
- Location
- Central FL
- Vehicle(s)
- '72 CJ5, 401, T18, D20, D44, D30
'82 CJ8, 258, D300, AMC20, D30
Exactly...I agree w/CJ, that it would be of little trouble.
As far as de-stroking for RPM potential, I don't see that replacing a forged reciprocating assembly with a cast reciprocating assembly, even of shorter stroke would extend you RPM's by much. I'd be more worried about oiling issues, & valve train problems.
401 = forged
360 = cast
But a destoked 401 would be badd <-BAD WORD->! The upper rpm potential would be
BrockGrimes
Jeep-CJ.com Archive Master
Similar threads
