Fan Clutch, thermal or non-thermal?
Hedgehog
Always Off-Roading Jeeper
- Posts
- 9,370
- Thanks
- 4
- Location
- Tucson/Marana Arizona
- Vehicle(s)
- -1975 Jeep CJ5, 360 V8, Headers, Duel Exhaust,T15 transmission, D-20 Transfer case, Twin Stick Conversion, Warn 8274 Winch
-1951 Willys Wagon, 4 cylinder, "F" head, little rust, very close to stock
The fan on my AMC 360 moves very easily, even at running temperature. I'm thinkin' the fan clutch might very well be toast. So, which is better a thermal fan clutch or a non-thermal clutch?
Apparently the thermal clutch doesn't engage until the engine is at running temperatures. The non-thermal engages at low RPM (as does the thermal unit) and doesn't pay attention to the engine temp.
Part of me says, "Let the engine heat up."
The other part says, "We are in a very warm climate, the engine will heat up just fine, besides the extra thermal coupling is just another thing to break or wear out."
Does one thought have merit over the other?
Apparently the thermal clutch doesn't engage until the engine is at running temperatures. The non-thermal engages at low RPM (as does the thermal unit) and doesn't pay attention to the engine temp.
Part of me says, "Let the engine heat up."
The other part says, "We are in a very warm climate, the engine will heat up just fine, besides the extra thermal coupling is just another thing to break or wear out."
Does one thought have merit over the other?