• Hello Guest, we are proud to now have our Wiki online that is completely compiled and written by our members. Feel free to browse our Jeep-CJ Wiki or click on any orange keyword when looking at posts in the forum.

1970s vs 1980s CJ AMC 20

1970s vs 1980s CJ AMC 20

Bent

Active Jeeper
Posts
396
Media
12
Solutions
1
Thanks
6
Location
Olympic Peninsula
Vehicle(s)
1982 CJ5, 1978 258, T177, Dana 300, AMC 20, Dana 30
I was just noticing how much beefier the 1970s CJ AMC 20s are. Someone may find this interesting.

1982 on the left, 1977 on the right.
 
What is the tube diameter? CJ AMC20 should be 2 5/8" the FSJ AMC20 2 3/4" The FSJ 20 is the same size as the FSJ 44.
 
That bigger one is from a truck. Also has thicker tubes and 1 piece axles.
LG
 
That bigger one is from a truck. Also has thicker tubes and 1 piece axles.
LG

Maybe not? Here is a picture of mine. I'm pretty sure it is the original axle and it is like the big one in Brent's pictures. Mine is a '79 CJ7 . :confused: Rod

20130611_075151_zps672a852a.webp
 
PB-Does yours have 1 piece axles?
The truck ones were wider than a CJ's.

LG
 
Looks like my pictures rotated the wrong way. The first picture shows the 1977 CJ5 axle on the left. The second picture shows the 1982 CJ5 axle on the left.
 
They are both narrow track CJ5 axles. Tube diameter is 2.50"

Thicker-I meant as in wall thickness of the tube.
Never seen the 'big' 20 from a CJ. Just the trucks.:confused:
LG
 
I don't know about the one piece axle. :rolleyes: I haven't tore into it yet. But now I'm excited to. :banana: Here's hoping for a one piece axle. :banana: Below is a better picture of the whole axle. I'll post the results back here for everybody with what I find. :D Rod

20130630_145420_zpscd1f1fd6.webp

Found this picture. If you look at the rear hub, looks like a two piece to me. So, I thinking not.

20130701_145534_zpsebbcf3d0.webp
 
Yup-Looks like a 2-POS axle to me also.
LG
 
Thicker-I meant as in wall thickness of the tube.
Never seen the 'big' 20 from a CJ. Just the trucks.:confused:
LG
The wall thickness may be thicker on the 1977 axle. I don't have a caliper that will reach down the tube but, the 1977 looks like the tubes are reduced more than the 1982 where they press into the housing. I wonder if the 1980s FSJ axles used the lighter casting or if they continued to get the heavier casting.

Anyone experience tube flex issues with a 1970s vintage axle?
 
Last edited:
AMC--------
Almost A Car
:D
LG
 

Similar threads

  • Question<br> <font color=black> Reply's are voted<br> on for best answer</font> Question
    Reply's are voted
    on for best answer
Replies
10
Views
75
  • Question<br> <font color=black> Reply's are voted<br> on for best answer</font> Question
    Reply's are voted
    on for best answer
Replies
17
Views
186
  • Question<br> <font color=black> Reply's are voted<br> on for best answer</font> Question
    Reply's are voted
    on for best answer
Replies
10
Views
146
  • Question<br> <font color=black> Reply's are voted<br> on for best answer</font> Question
    Reply's are voted
    on for best answer
Replies
6
Views
100

Jeep-CJ Donation Drive

Help support Jeep-CJ.com by making a contribution.

Help support Jeep-CJ.com by making a contribution.
Goal
$200.00
Earned
$25.00
This donation drive ends in
0 hours, 0 minutes, 0 seconds
  12.5%
Back
Top Bottom