Build Thread 79 CJ7 "They’re coming to take me away aha"
007
Crazy Sr. Respected Jeeper
- Posts
- 3,445
- Media
- 5
- Solutions
- 1
- Thanks
- 64
- Location
- Reno, NV
- Vehicle(s)
- #1 - 1977 CJ-7 Renegade (Daisy Jane), Levis trim, 304, TH400, BW1339 (MM), D30/Auburn Max, AMC20/Trac-Lok/G2's, 4.88's, 33" BFG MT KM2's, Edelbrock Performer intake, Holley Sniper 4bbl EFI, MSD6, MSD ProBillet distributor, OME shocks, 4" ProComp lift.
#2 - 1984 CJ-7 Laredo (The Texas Hooker Project - Incomplete/Undecided)
I had the same questions about vacuum advance. I think that by the book, Posi is right but in some situations manifold vacuum is better because you can get quicker advance if that's what you need. I switched mine from ported to manifold and I could tell a difference in throttle response.
I think that the situations where manifold is better is when you're trying to compensate for something else regardless of whether you should be or not. In my case, I'm tuned for 10,000 feet but I'm sitting 400 feet. When I actually get to 10,000 feet, I might decide I'm not set up to where I need to be. .
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I think that the situations where manifold is better is when you're trying to compensate for something else regardless of whether you should be or not. In my case, I'm tuned for 10,000 feet but I'm sitting 400 feet. When I actually get to 10,000 feet, I might decide I'm not set up to where I need to be. .
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk